▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I used to get the print edition of The Economist. It really does feel a lot different from browsing reddit/HN/etc. * You're reading in a linear format. Fewer distractions. * No tabsplosion. No clickbait titles. * Little to zero internet drama. * You're leaned back on the couch instead of hunched over a computer or phone. * You're closer to reading about a random/representative sample of what's going on in the world, as opposed to the "dog bites man" internet story of the week. Fewer breathless takes on everything. The nice thing about a print magazine is that it actually does its job of giving you a break from your day, instead of turning into a distraction timesuck. It's easy to put down after reading an article or two that strikes your interest. Unfortunately I did notice a bit of a slide in quality as The Economist started adopting the "shove our opinion down your throat" editorial style that's super common online. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ruszki 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> The Economist started adopting the "shove our opinion down your throat" editorial style That’s their intention since the beginning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_editorial_stance I’m a subscriber for about 15 years now, and they shoved their opinion down my throat even 15 years ago. That didn’t change. Unfortunately, they are still better than almost anything else imho. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Animats 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Unfortunately I did notice a bit of a slide in quality as The Economist started adopting the "shove our opinion down your throat" editorial style that's super common online. Is the Economist still publishing a print edition? Barnes and Noble hasn't had a new issue since mid-July. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|