▲ | ruszki 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> The Economist started adopting the "shove our opinion down your throat" editorial style That’s their intention since the beginning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_editorial_stance I’m a subscriber for about 15 years now, and they shoved their opinion down my throat even 15 years ago. That didn’t change. Unfortunately, they are still better than almost anything else imho. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't mind them having an opinion. I do mind them (for example) stating that individuals at a particular political conference "look like they had been bullied as children, or else should have been bullied". How do you rank the Economist, WSJ, Bloomberg, and FT? I view them as the big 4 English-language "serious investor publications" -- curious if you can think of others. (Generally I view investor publications as more incentivized towards accuracy. Investors will pay for information which allows them to make accurate predictions about asset prices. That's a better feedback loop for truth than most publications get. Lots of real-world events are reflected in asset prices.) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | hugh-avherald 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Economist is much like LLMs: good if you don't know much about the subject. |