| ▲ | DaSHacka 5 days ago |
| Hence why this very post is about the method those companies are using to prevent such theft (in this case, facial recognition). |
|
| ▲ | fluoridation 5 days ago | parent [-] |
| This subthread is not about the use of such a technology, but about Home Depot tracking a customer to build a prosecution case over time. So, no, they're not using it to prevent theft, they're using it to punish theft they've allowed. |
| |
| ▲ | DaSHacka 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Potato, potato. Why should the company prosecuting the thieves be anyone else's problem? | | |
| ▲ | nobody9999 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | >Why should the company prosecuting the thieves be anyone else's problem? Because a company isn't the government. The government prosecutes. A company might be an interested bystander, but they don't prosecute anyone. | |
| ▲ | fluoridation 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sorry, not sure what you're getting at. |
|
|
