I disagree. I think it’s worthwhile trying these things out to see what’s working and what isn’t. We can sit and think and discuss all we want but sometimes you need to build something and try.

▲

thrown-0825 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

none of it is working, MIT just released a paper showing that the overwhelming majority of orgs adopting llm workflows have seen no benefit

	▲	__MatrixMan__ 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think that the overwhelming majority of orgs are too inflexible to just insert LLM access, step back, and ask of it was an improvement. I think you're more likely to see an effect if you can somehow capture how far a solo founder gets before they need to bring on the second employee. Because LLMs aren't better than me at my job, but they are better than me at many jobs which I can tolerate being done poorly. If there is a significant technological shift, it'll be when those startups start outperforming the ones for which LLMs weren't available at the start.

▲

donperignon 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

nah, i am too old, i already know that this is not useful and it will generate security issues in the short term.

▲

phist_mcgee 4 days ago | parent [-]

Wow, must be amazing to be the first omniscient human being!

	▲	donperignon 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		It’s called experience. Never say i know everything. I know this is hype nonsense that’s all. Thank me later.