There’s an obvious workaround - require the payment for everyone, and on the side offer to pay the customer $x (which coincidentally is the same as the payment needed) for personal information.

▲

Ukv a day ago | parent [-]

I don't think this trick would do anything - you're still conditioning a contract on consent (and it's no more necessary than before), so still don't have "freely given consent" if you wanted to rely on that basis for data processing.

▲

mytailorisrich a day ago | parent [-]

You're repeating a claim that is widespread but that appears nowhere in the GDPR.

▲

Ukv a day ago | parent [-]

> > Consent is presumed not to be freely given [...] if the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is dependent on the consent despite such consent not being necessary for such performance.

	▲	mytailorisrich a day ago \| parent [-]
		That's not the same as your previous comment.