| ▲ | kenjackson 5 days ago |
| That seems like a bad reason to swear off streaming services. Do you not shop at stores because they don’t carry offensive clothing? |
|
| ▲ | Sabinus 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| If a tshirt rental store was renting me my favourite tshirt (not available to buy) for two decades then decided it wasn't available any more because other people don't like the shirt design, I would be pissed and not want to support the tshirt rental industry any more. |
|
| ▲ | DowsingSpoon 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That’s a bad analogy. It works against your point. It seems entirely, entirely reasonable to avoid a clothing store that refuses to stock hip styles simply because they’re “offensive”. For an example using the cliche, many people find a naked ankle to be completely acceptable. |
| |
| ▲ | kenjackson 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Yours is wrong. Yours would work if you liked all the clothes there but then one day they stopped selling Kanye West’s Nazi shirt that you liked because people found it offensive. And then you stopped shopping there because of that. The analogy requires you giving up what you want because they stopped carrying something others find offensive. Not that they don’t sell what you like all up. In which case it makes perfect sense not to shop there. |
|
|
| ▲ | weberer 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| That's a really awkward analogy. A better one would be: Would you buy an album with all the curse words bleeped out?
A lot of people would, but others would prefer the uncensored version. |
| |
| ▲ | kenjackson 5 days ago | parent [-] | | That’s a worse analogy. The other guy doesn’t want to use a service because they don’t offer content he wants because people are offended by it. There’s a bunch of clothes not sold at most retailers because it is offensive but you can buy them online directly from the manufacturer. The analogy you gave would be better if they edited the content to be semantically equivalent but they aren’t. The content just isn’t available. Now maybe the argument is that you’re paying for the service. In which case it would be like Costco where you have a membership and they definitely don’t carry offensive material. | | |
| ▲ | lotsoweiners 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The biggest problem IMO is that they are picking and choosing what is offensive. I can watch over 100 episodes of very offensive (to someone) episodes of Always Sunny episodes on Hulu. However, they decided 1 concept from 1 scene of a handful of episodes is more offensive than everything else and removed those.
I think an analogy could be Home Depot sells a dimming light with 10 settings. Some group of people can’t deal with 2 of those settings so the manufacturer removed 2 of the settings and now everyone gets a lower quality product because of this decision. | | |
| ▲ | kenjackson 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Is there anything offensive that Home Depot shouldn’t carry? Or should they carry everything? |
|
|
|