▲ | poly2it 8 days ago | |||||||||||||
Very cool project! Just out of interest, I sent a query I've had difficulties getting good results for with major engines: "what are some good options for high-resolution ultrawide monitors?". The response in this engine for this query at this point seems to have the same fallacy as I've seen in other engines. Meta-pages "specialising" in broad rankings are preferred above specialist data about the specific sought-after item. It seems that the desire for a ranking weighs the most. If I were to manually try to answer this query, I would start by looking at hardware forums and geeky blogs, pick N candidates, then try to find the specifications and quirks for all products. Of course, it is difficult to generically answer if a given website has performed this analysis. It can be favourable to rank sites citing specific data higher in these circumstances. As a user, I would prefer to be presented with the initial sources used for assembling this analysis. Of course, this doesn't happen because engines don't perform this kind of bottom-to-top evaluation. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | ricardobeat 7 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
You could argue that it is not really a search query. There is not a particular page that answers the question “correctly”, it requires collating multiple sources and reasoning. That is not a search problem. | ||||||||||||||
|