This argument almost feels disingenuous to me. Of course, there isn't going to be one resource that will completely answer the question. However, there are going to be resources that are much likelier to contain correct parts to the answer and there are resources that are much likely to contain just SEO fluff.

The whole premise of what makes a good search engine has been based on the idea of surfacing those results that most likely contain good information. If that was not the case Google would not have risen to such dominance in the first place.