▲ | corimaith 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That's the point, you can only change YOUR history. From the perspective of future merchant, that's the trivial to deal with. And for existing transactions, you'd need the value of the goods from the transactions to exceed the cost of controlling to network to be worth it. But what kind of goods that can be transferred so quickly be worth that much? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | xnorswap 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe there's more resilience to prevent chain swaps now, but my understanding of the original blockchain algorithm is that: At block N someone could start to privately mine (empty) blocks. They keep mining in private until block N+x is public, at which time the private (51%) chain is length N+x+1. They then announce their longer chain. By the protocol, this longer chain (technically "most work" chain) is the more trusted one, and undoes any transactions in N+1 through N+x. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|