▲ | SamPatt 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
More or less, but the private chain doesn't need to contain empty blocks. A more sophisticated attack would include all the legitimate transactions on the network except for their own transaction(s) which they're trying to double spend. That way the network isn't disrupted apart from the parties you're double spending against. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | xnorswap 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Indeed, but I was arguing that the parent claim that "only your transactions" could be affected was false. It's true that you can't synthesise false transactions, but you can undo anyone's transactions, not just your own. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | LikesPwsh 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That way you can also claim 100% of mining rewards with 51% hash rate. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|