That can be automated away too.

People will be more than willing to say, "Claude, impersonate me and act on my behalf".

I do this every time I find myself typing something I could get written up over or even fired for.

1. I'm usually too emotional to write out why I feel that way instead of saying what I feel.

2. I really don't like the person (or their idea) but I don't want to get fired over it.

Claude is really great at this: "Other person said X, I think it is stupid and they're a moron for suggesting this. Explain to them why this is a terrible idea or tell me I'm being an idiot."

Sometimes it tells me I'm being an idiot, sometimes it gives me nearly copy-pasta text that I can use and agree with.

> People will be more than willing to say, "Claude, impersonate me and act on my behalf".

I'm now imagining a future where actual people's identities are blacklisted just like some IP addresses are dead to email, and a market develops for people to sell their identity to spammers.

I mean, that's fine I guess as long as its respectable and respects the forum.

"Claude write a summary of the word doc I wrote about x and post it as a reply comment," is fine. I dont see why it wouldnt be. Its a good faith effort to post.

"Claude, post every 10 seconds to reddit to spam people to believe my politics is correct," isn't but that's not the case. Its not a good faith effort.

The moderation rules for 'human slop' will apply to AI too. Try spamming a well moderated reddit and see how far you get, human or AI.

That's fine, because once someone is banned, the impersonations are also banned.