Remix.run Logo
dspillett 8 days ago

Picking 300MB as a ridiculous amount of data to download dates that nicely without needing to look at the article header.

Though using the codecs and hardware of that time I doubt the quality at even that size would be great. Compare an old 349MB (sized to fit two on a CD-R/-RW, likely 480p though smaller wasn't uncommon) cap of a Stargate episode picked up in the early/mid 20XXs to a similarly sized file compressed using h265 or even h264 on modern hardware.

quickthrowman 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

I recall Xvid rips of SD television content being just fine quality wise, even at the 350MB per episode that ‘the scene’ used. A modern encoding at 480P might have slightly better compression in dark areas, but SD television is kinda janky compared to HD.

H.265 or H.264 would absolutely crush Xvid for compressing HD content, both in size and quality.

xp84 8 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I appreciate the usage of SG-1 as an example, as I definitely still have several seasons of SG-1 episodes of that size floating around old hard drives somewhere. XVID, of course.