▲ | lenerdenator 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
Remember: you can do almost anything in America so long as a retirement fund gets to wet its beak. Murder-for-hire? That's not only a first-degree murder charge, it's RICO. You're looking at the gurney in Terre Haute as a real possibility. Operating a company that takes money from people on the promise that they'll be able to use it to cover medical expenses, then denying the payout because you already promised that money to shareholders who want to move to Florida to swing on and off the golf course at the retirement community they like, all while letting the person die a miserable death from a treatable illness? Perfectly legal. Encouraged. You have Congress' ear. Same here. Reading a book that no one wants to sell without paying for it? Intellectual property theft. Having a LLM model do the same and then charging for access to said model's output? Here's a seat behind the President at the inauguration. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | FridayoLeary 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
That's just silly. There is no moral comparison between the two. I wouldn't bother to respond, except that it's this sort of attitude that was behind the gleeful response and support of a cold blooded murder. | ||||||||||||||
|