That's just silly. There is no moral comparison between the two. I wouldn't bother to respond, except that it's this sort of attitude that was behind the gleeful response and support of a cold blooded murder.

Yes, there is. The corporation is worse even because they do it on a mass scale.

The response to that UHC ceo is entirely his and the corporation’s fault. Actions have consequences.

"That's just silly."

... how?

I can point at myriad examples in which someone's life was ended because expending the monetary resources necessary to extend it was not in the best interests of shareholder returns.