Remix.run Logo
FredPret 7 days ago

I love the idea of that 90mm prime.

But usually when I have passers-by take photos, the context is that we are posing in front of a church in Europe or something, and space can be limited.

I can't very well ask people to take a photo and but first to take 20 paces back and then do a crouch!

My wife wants to see our shoes as well as the church spires in the same photo. Maybe a 35mm or even 28mm would work well in our case.

PaulHoule 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

Definitely thinking of getting another prime but a ‘normal’ one with autofocus doesn’t really do anything I can’t with my zooms, I like 7artisans primes and might get one that is crazy wide but those are manual focus and take more skill —- I was so happy to get home and see I nailed this one

https://mastodon.social/@UP8/114042752203552070

FredPret 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

I find that photos from a prime look better in some undefinable way. Maybe it's because there's more light coming through, or maybe it's just easier for them to make a prime with great optics than a zoom with great optics.

I shoot on manual with auto-ISO straight to JPG (I don't have time for RAW editing), so my prime photos tend to have lower ISO's and I end up with a faster shutter.

amluto 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

I’m suspicious that a lot of the apparent inherent benefit of a prime lens is that it can’t zoom, which forces the person holding it to think a little bit more about composition.

It would be an amusing experiment to compare a prime lens to a zoom lens that it somehow fixed to the same focal length. Maybe level the playing field a little bit by applying distortion correction to both lenses.

rodgerd 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There's measurements to support your feeling that primes are better than zooms: https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/11/stopping-down-some-... and https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2017/02/things-you-didnt-wa...

scottapotamas 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There’s a lot more to it, but I attribute a lot of ‘better in some way’ to microcontrast followed by how the lens handles the transition to out of focus detail.

PaulHoule 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, back when I had a Canon my only lens was a wide angle prime. I really like that Sony 90mm prime, DxO says it is Sony's best lens and I think it is.

Ever since I started shooting sports indoors (often w/ that 90mm prime or a 135mm prime) and started to depend on noise reduction I process everything with DxO and tend to use a lot of sharpening and color grading. One day I went out with the kit lens by accident and set the aperture really small and developed the "Monkey Run Style" for hyperrealistic landscapes that look like they were shot with a weird Soviet camera.

The lens I walk around with the most and usually photograph runners with is the Tamron 28-200 which is super-versatile for events and just walking around, I used it for the last two albums here

https://www.yogile.com/537458/all

but for the Forest Frolic I used my 16-35mm Zeiss but it was tough because it was raining heavily -- I was lucky to have another volunteer who held an umbrella for me, but I couldn't lean in. The last one (Thom B) was not color graded because I'd had some bad experiences color grading sports when I got the color of the jersey wrong but now I use color grades that are less strong -- at Trackapalooza the greens just came out too strident and I had to bring them down.

To give you some idea of how powerful noise reduction is, this shot

https://bsky.app/profile/up-8.bsky.social/post/3lv32zudu2c2d

was done in ISO 80,000 with that Tamron -- I wouldn't say it looks perfectly natural for a picture of cat that was not standing still in a room in a basement that is amazing.

FredPret 7 days ago | parent [-]

Incredible, in the 90's I could barely take a picture of my dog in broad daylight, and it cost money for the film, and I had to wait forever to get the photos back, and then the dog was blurry.

BTW your yogile album is private.

PaulHoule 7 days ago | parent [-]

See these

https://www.yogile.com/forest-frolic-2025#21m

https://www.yogile.com/trackapalooza-2025#21m

https://www.yogile.com/thom-b-2025#21m

I have no nostalgia for film, I could not afford to take 1500 film photos at a sports event -- even a photo like this which doesn't seem that remarkable

https://mastodon.social/@UP8/114401857009398302

wouldn't have come out that good handheld with a 35mm back in the day.

AuryGlenz 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

All your points are true, but primes tend to have more character as well. I’m no optical engineer so I can’t speak as to why, but it seems like they have more choices on prime design than they do on zooms.

zimpenfish 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> I like 7artisans prime

Just got their 10mm M43 (~20mm equivalent) and it's doing a good job[0] - focus peaking on the OM helps a lot with manual focus and aged eyes.

[0] Excepting that it's still wide enough to capture your fingers when adjusting focus or aperture[1] or holding the lens.

[1] Which is the wrong way around to "normal" - clockwise should close the aperture, not open it!

zensavona 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Pro tip: 28mm on full frame (or equivalent) is exactly the same focal length as iPhone 1x ;)