The tax credits aren't coming out of the grid somewhere else. The project is a negative to tax revenue, positive to the grid, and positive to CO2 levels.

▲

baking 14 hours ago | parent [-]

He's using the tax credits to undersell projects with storage that would have been more positive for the grid. Solar without storage in Texas is coal to Newcastle. Subsidizing bare-bones solar is not good for the grid.

▲

zekrioca a minute ago | parent | next [-]

Because they don’t want to upgrade the grid, don’t want to compromise even in flexible cases, and want to keep everything as is.

▲

Dylan16807 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Projects with storage can take advantage of the cheaper solar power by shifting their balance, installing fewer panels and more storage. This leaves the grid better off overall.

	▲	baking 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Projects with storage can also take advantage of lower grid connection power limits because they are not forced to dump maximum power at peak supply times of the day.

▲

giblfiz 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Battery and and solar with battery have (nearly) the same tax credit advantage.