▲ | baking 15 hours ago | |||||||
He's using the tax credits to undersell projects with storage that would have been more positive for the grid. Solar without storage in Texas is coal to Newcastle. Subsidizing bare-bones solar is not good for the grid. | ||||||||
▲ | zekrioca an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Because they don’t want to upgrade the grid, don’t want to compromise even in flexible cases, and want to keep everything as is. | ||||||||
▲ | Dylan16807 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Projects with storage can take advantage of the cheaper solar power by shifting their balance, installing fewer panels and more storage. This leaves the grid better off overall. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | giblfiz 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Battery and and solar with battery have (nearly) the same tax credit advantage. |