▲ | cosmic_cheese 19 hours ago | |||||||
There’s a similar disdain for menubars which I really can’t understand. The disorderly and abbreviated hamburger menus that most often are used as a replacement are just worse on every single axis except for maybe visual appeal. They throw out what could be the single strain of consistent usability across apps in favor of looking good on a PowerPoint slide and web marketing blurb. | ||||||||
▲ | aidenn0 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Two of GNOME's recent updates have made searching menus for a rarely used item incredibly painful: 1. Replace the menubar with a hamburger menu; in some cases the hamburger menu then contains file/edit/&c. so it's just a spurious extra click 2. Require a click to see the contents of a submenu and a click to go back Fortunately my most-used GNOME application (Evolution) has an option to restore the old behavior for both of those, but I literally cannot think of the motivation for these two changes that clearly make things worse. The only halfway plausible idea I have heard for #2 is that the GNOME UX designers think that submenus are bad, so if you make them hard enough to use, developers will stop putting them in their applications. #1 is probably partly a looks thing, and partly a "too many people have fewer horizontal lines on their screens than I did in 2004[1]" thing. 1: That's when I got a 1600x1200 monitor; people today with 1080p screens have only 56 more lines than the 1280x1024 monitor I had been using since the previous millennium | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mo_42 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I agree. Hamburger menus aren't any better than menu bars. It seems like an example where design has more importance than function. My alternative to the menu bar would be a search bar that allowed me to search in a Google style everything related to that program: functions, features, shortcuts, and documentation. File | Edit | View | etc. is not the right choice for every program. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | mike_hearn 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Hamburger menus work much better on mobile screens that are horizontally constrained, are less visually intrusive when not in use and don't require at least two levels of nesting like classical desktop menu bars do. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | sombragris 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Agreed. And the worst part is that you could use a (well designed) menubar with a keyboard by using the Alt-key combinations together with cursor key menu navigation and similar techniques. But you don't have that luxury in hamburger menus. You are forced to use a pointing device such as the mouse, or if you are lucky, a completely non-standard key combination to bring it down. Awful. |