▲ | quantumHazer 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
The example you made has, in fact, a documentation | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | afro88 5 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You don't point this tool at the documentation though. You point it at a repo. Granted, this example (and others) have plenty of inline documentation. And, public documentation is likely in the training data for LLMs. But, this is more than just a prompt. The tool generates really nicely structured and readable tutorials that let you understand codebases at a conceptual level easier than reading docstrings and code. Even if it's only useful for public repos with documentation, that's still useful, and flippant dismissals are counterproductive. I am keen to try this with one of my own (private, badly documented) codebases and see how it fares. I've actually found LLMs quite useful at explaining code, so I have high hopes. | |||||||||||||||||
|