A valid point of criticism, but I do wonder if this only applies to those who can (still) easily spot LLM assisted output.

Many people lack the time or writing skills to produce something elegant by themselves, so for them it's like fake breasts: an upgrade for the less discerning larger part of the target audience, as long as they don't look to closely.

>A valid point of criticism, but I do wonder if this only applies to those who can (still) easily spot LLM assisted output.

It is still somewhat easy to spot LLM output.

The number of humans who aren't a committee of MBAs and lawyers crafting a memo by consensus that reads like this: "Absolutely! A well-arranged conference can be a delightful experience. Here are some ideas to inspire you:" can be counted on zero fingers.

There is always the risk that what you are reading was indeed written by a committee of MBAs and lawyers crafting a memo by consensus.

My coworkers and I have taken to screenshotting the vapid LLM autoresponses in the tools we use, circling the most appropriate and/or depressingly funny option in red, and sending an image as a message.