>A valid point of criticism, but I do wonder if this only applies to those who can (still) easily spot LLM assisted output.

It is still somewhat easy to spot LLM output.

The number of humans who aren't a committee of MBAs and lawyers crafting a memo by consensus that reads like this: "Absolutely! A well-arranged conference can be a delightful experience. Here are some ideas to inspire you:" can be counted on zero fingers.

There is always the risk that what you are reading was indeed written by a committee of MBAs and lawyers crafting a memo by consensus.

My coworkers and I have taken to screenshotting the vapid LLM autoresponses in the tools we use, circling the most appropriate and/or depressingly funny option in red, and sending an image as a message.