| ▲ | lxgr 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
That's a pretty reductionist view. Even maximally pro-IP laws usually have significant carve-outs for derivative works or other scenarios; see for example the US's extensive "fair use" doctrine. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cratermoon 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
You're begging the question: it's not established the LLM models are derivative or fair use under those laws. Also, the de facto state of fair use in the US is not what I would call "extensive". | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | andybak 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Do I have to repeat "copyright violation isn't theft" on every post for eternity? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||