▲ | ManuelKiessling 17 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have just checked my article — the word "expert" isn't in it, so not quite sure where you got this from. I'm working in the field professionally since June 1998, and among other things, I was the tech lead on MyHammer.de, Germany's largest craftsman platform, and have built several other mid-scale online platforms over the decades. How well I have done this, now that's for others to decide. Quite objectively though, I do have some amount of experience — even a bad developer probably cannot help but pick up some learnings over so many years in relevant real-world projects. However, and I think I stated this quite clearly, I am expressively not an expert in Python. And yet, I could realize an actually working solution that solves an actual problem I had in a very real sense (and is nicely humming away for several weeks now). And this is precisely where yes, I did experience a 10x productivity increase; it would have certainly taken me at least a week or two to realize the same solution myself. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | necovek 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies for implying you are claiming to be an expert software engineer: I took the "senior" in the title and "25 years of experience" in the post to mean similar things as "expert". I don't doubt this is doing something useful for you. It might even be mostly correct. But it is not a positive advertisement for what AI can do: just like the code is objectively crap, you can't easily trust the output without a comprehensive review. And without doubting your expertise, I don't think you reviewed it, or you would have caught the same smells I did. What this article tells me is that when the task is sufficiently non-critical that you can ignore being perfectly correct, you can steer AI coding assistants into producing some garbage code that very well might work or appear to work (when you are making stats, those are tricky even with utmost manual care). Which is amazing, in my opinion! But not what the premise seems to be (how a senior will make it do something very nice with decent quality code). Out of curiosity why did you not build this tool in a language you generally use? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|