▲ | ManuelKiessling 7 hours ago | |||||||
Because I wanted exactly this experience: can I get to the desired result — functionality-wise, if not code-wise! — even if I choose the stack that makes sense in terms of technology, not the one that I happen to be proficient in? And if I cannot bring language-proficiency to the table — which of my capabilities as a seasoned software&systems guy can I put to use? In the brown-field projects where my team and I have the AI implement whole features, the resulting code quality — under our sharp and experienced eyes — tends to end up just fine. I think I need to make the differences between both examples more clear… | ||||||||
▲ | necovek 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Ok, I guess you shouldn't complain that you really got exactly what you wanted. However, your writing style implied that the result was somehow better because you were otherwise an experienced engineer. Even your clarification in the post sits right below your statement how your experience made this very smooth, with no explanation that you were going to be happy with bad code as long as it works. | ||||||||
|