▲ | rybosworld 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
This entire article reads like hopium. And it seems predicated on the false belief that companies are going to try to replace their entire workforce with AI overnight: > "Imagine a company that fires its software engineers, replaces them with AI-generated code, and then sits back" It should go without saying this is not even possible at the moment. Will it be possible one day? Yes, probably. And when that day comes, the fantasies this author has dreamed up will be irrelevant. I've said it before and I'll say it again: It shocks me that a forum filled with tech professionals, is so blindly biased against AI that they refuse to acknowledge what changes are coming. All of these conversations boil down to: "The LLM's of today couldn't replace me." That's probably true for most folks. What's also true is that ChatGPT was released less than 3 years ago. And we've seen it go from a novelty with no real use, to something that can write actually decent research papers and gets better at coding by the month. "B-b-but there's no guarantee it will continue to improve!" is one of the silliest trains of thought a computer scientist could hold. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | vunderba a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Couple things: 1. The "LLMs are still in their infancy" argument is frequently trotted out but let's be clear - GPTs were introduced back in 2018 - so SEVEN years ago. 2. It shocks me that a forum filled with tech professionals, is so blindly biased against AI that they refuse to acknowledge what changes are coming. This feels like a corollary to the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon. I don't think you can extrapolate that a few dozen loudly dissenting voices is necessarily representative of majority opinion. 3. I would like to see a citation of ChatGPT releasing actual "decent research papers". 4. If AIs get to the point of actually acting in a completely autonomous fashion and replace software engineers - then there's no reason to believe that they won't also obliterate 90% of other white-collar jobs (including other STEM) so at that point we're looking at needing to completely re-evaluate our economic system possibly with UBI, etc. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | itsoktocry 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
>I've said it before and I'll say it again: It shocks me that a forum filled with tech professionals, is so blindly biased against AI that they refuse to acknowledge what changes are coming. I have the exact same reaction reading this stuff on HN. It's hilarious, scary and sad, all at the same time. The speed at which these tools have improved has completely convinced me that these things are going to take over. But I don't fear it, I'm excited about it. But I don't write code for code's sake; I'm using code to solve problems. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dmix 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Even if we don't write code software engineers (or technically minded people) will be able to coordinate hundreds of AI bots better than the average person and manage the systems. If there's a day where programming is not as valuable I'm pretty confident I can find some way to be useful in the future economy. And if it's real AGI, not airplanes flying themselves with a pilot stuff, then we probably will have to re-think employment anyway | |||||||||||||||||
|