▲ | no_wizard 10 hours ago | |||||||
If you want to know what they’re paying interest rate wise you aren’t going online to find it. We are talking about private bankers and exclusive preferred lender terms. These do go below (sometimes far below) market rates. We are talking about folks who typically have 50 million USD+ in assets. They may even do all this via their own private corporation investment vehicles which further skews things. This is why I was talking about wealth qualifications. all these loan types can be used in other scenarios, but the scenario I reference has a certain pattern to it that is unique to tax avoidance schemes. It’s a combination of factors not only one thing. Let’s take it at face value though. How fast do you think Mark Zuckerbergs wealth grows in a year? Or how about the CEO of any major corporation for that matter? Or even someone who heads a private company with say $150 Million ARR? Do you think it’s less than 8%? Heck do you think it’s less than 15%? And this is before we start accounting for things like tax deductions for the interest paid on the loans | ||||||||
▲ | Aloisius 8 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I gave example for a $10 million line of credit. The assets required for that it is $50 million. For goodness sake, the interbank rate right now is 4.8%. No one is getting close to that no matter how much they are worth. Someone like Mark Zuckerberg does not need this for anything but short-term cash - where you don't want to, or can't do to trading rules, liquidate assets immediately or all at once. Instead you get a loan, sell assets slowly to cover it and repay it as quickly as you can. The idea that someone in their 40s is living off debt as a capital gains tax avoidance strategy frankly sounds like someone has mistaken a financial services advertisement for a sound strategy. | ||||||||
|