| ▲ | johnea 19 hours ago |
| The article is mostly focused on race tracks, and especially drag racing. But to me "hot rodding" explicitly means street racing. And in street racing, and driving fast responsive cars in general, electric is the future. I just recently started owning one, and it drives better than any other vehicle I have ever driven. The instant acceleration, the very fine power control, and the weight distribution make it more responsive and better handling than literally any other car I've ever driven (and I've been driving for 50 years). |
|
| ▲ | Animats 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Power hasn't been a problem in racing for decades now. All the major racing circuits, from F1 to NASCAR, have power limits in some form. It's maintaining ground contact that's hard. There was an electric dragster, the Lead Wedge, in 1969.[1] It was really crude but performed OK. There was enough unhappiness about an electric doing so well that the sponsoring battery company didn't do it again. Their main customer was auto companies. The fastest motorcycle is currently an electric.[2] Somebody took it up to Alice's Restaurant above Woodside and drove Skyline on it. Which is a scary thought, if you know the area. [1] https://www.hotrod.com/features/batteries-and-a-salt-februar... [2] https://newatlas.com/lightning-ls218-review-ls-218/36470 |
| |
| ▲ | angled 14 hours ago | parent [-] | | Loud pipes save lives… What will be the electric motorcycle equivalent? A standards based notification system for nearby vehicles? | | |
| ▲ | wffurr 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Vigilance and proper operation and safety procedures would save a lot more lives than any kind of noisemaker. | |
| ▲ | mrob 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The probably kill more than they save by impaired health from the stress and sleep deprivation they cause. | |
| ▲ | dexterdog 13 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How much do they? The bulk of the sound is behind the bike where it serves no purpose other than angering people because of how overly loud they are. | |
| ▲ | 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hristov 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You are absolutely right about electric cars and how fun it is to drive them. I just want to make the obligatory statement that street racing is very dangerous for innocent people and nobody should do it or encourage it. |
|
| ▲ | rascul 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The article is mostly focused on race tracks, and especially drag racing. But to me "hot rodding" explicitly means street racing. Hot rodding about fast cars. Racing doesn't need to come into the picture at all to have a hot rod. |
| |
| ▲ | serf 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | >Hot rodding about fast cars. the whole hotrod culture produced those fast cars in order to compete with the police, it then turned into in-group competition, and then formal racing. 'hot rodding' wouldn't exist without competition. The first SCTA style 'hot-rods' were 'souped up' ford flatheads that were lucky to have over 80 horsepower going for top speed runs. What i'm saying is that 'racing' was before 'fast' in the history of hot-rodding. p.s. this also applies to the almost-entirely-disconnected very early European car scene. It was racing events and famous individuals that drove the entire culture -- this then lead to 'fast cars'. The history of the Mille Miglia comes to mind. |
|
|
| ▲ | eropple 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yup--electric performance vehicles are unreal when you first give one a try. I test drove a Ford Lightning this week and it is ridiculous what a 7,000-lb vehicle can do with that powertrain (to the point where honestly maybe it should require a CDL to drive). Just for kicks I also tried a Mach-E, which was the same kind of zip but without the novelty of being in a three-ton monster. Both felt glued to the road and they were real pleasures to drive. I really wanted to pull the trigger on the Lightning, but it really was Too Big (won't even really fit in my driveway). Instead I picked a PHEV Escape SUV that'll become my wife's in 4-5 years (so we retain gas ranges on at least one vehicle) and I'll reevaluate what I can get in electric then. The Escape PHEV, however, has all the other advantages except the instant torque; I've never had a vehicle so able to finely control power and the eCVT smooths out the kind of lagging a conventional transmission has on hills and the like. Using zero gas for an hour-long drive is a nice plus, too. The future of cars, including and maybe especially fast cars, is exciting. |
| |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 13 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | As a recent (a few weeks ago, in fact) buyer of a Lightning, as well as a two-time Tesla owner ... I totally agree. My pickup weighs 6500 pounds and will hit 60 mph in 3.8 seconds. That is ridiculous. Technically that makes it faster than my Model 3LR (though traction on damp pavement is definitely better on the Tesla than on the Ford). It's easily the best pickup I've ever driven. Perfect (and I mean perfect) 50/50 weight balance, astonishing power, low center of gravity, etc. It simultaneously feels like a 6500 pound truck, but also doesn't. It feels like it defies physics sometimes. > The future of cars, including and maybe especially fast cars, is exciting. 1000% agree. We used to think that the horsepower wars of the 2010s was the pinnacle of performance, but EVs are just raising the bar even higher. | | |
| ▲ | jcgrillo 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Will it still be maintainable in 30-40yr? Just the other day I pulled my 80 series Land Cruiser's windshield wiper motor to epoxy one of the permanent magnets back on (it had come loose from the housing and was making a horrible grinding noise). That part is made to be rebuilt, it's every bit as simple and straightforward as the century old Westinghouse motor in my drill press. I'm confident with nothing more than my lathe I could manufacture the parts necessary to keep that thing working indefinitely. The problem with modern cars in my view, in no particular order: 1. Too much proprietary software.
2. Proprietary interfaces--no way to swap computers between cars. They're universal computers for fuck's sake, why can't we just replace them? If my 1995 Toyota had sensibly designed, open interfaces I'd be easily able to replace any computer on it with off the shelf components.
3. Too much complexity. The hardware and software has gotten so intricately intertwined that reverse engineering it is pretty hopeless, at least from the perspective of someone just trying to keep their vehicles going. Even if point (2) above were addressed and we started talking seriously about building stuff that's meant to last we'd still have to face how damnably complicated these systems have become. The problem in my view is nobody is trying to make an EV that I'd still want to own in 30-40yr. I'm confident if I watch the market and stockpile enough parts, and learn how to rebuild the ones that are getting rare or NLA, that I'll be able to make this 1995 Cruiser go indefinitely. If I have to make my own transmission control unit or engine controller I'm pretty sure I could do that, or hack some cob job together well enough to get me down the road. I have no such confidence about "modern" vehicles. If someone makes an EV that looks like I'll still be able to keep it going 30+yr from now I'll buy it on the spot, but so far they all look like 5yr lifespan landfill bait. | |
| ▲ | briandear 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | How far can your truck tow anything? We run a motorcycle race team in Spain and going electric for our logistics vehicles would be a nightmare. Currently we can get from Barcelona to Jerez in a day. With electric that becomes 2 days, sometimes three. Several hours to charge a vehicle is a huge amount of time waiting around, especially when paying drivers by the hour, not to mention the electric vehicles are so heavy that it means a 3500kg electric van doesn’t have nearly the same payload as the diesel equivalent. So we either need bigger vehicles (requiring a commercial license and more expense) or we have to have more vehicles to move the same stuff. |
| |
| ▲ | bluedino 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Soemthing like a Tesla Plaid (or even a P120) is light years ahead of a Mach E in performance. | | |
| ▲ | dexterdog 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's a bit of an overstatement, but by your gauge it's also light years ahead in cost. | | |
| ▲ | bluedino 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Also, Car and Driver had this to say about the Mach E Not as fun to drive as a true muscle car... acceleration zeal past 60 mph drops off quickly. Meanwhile they called the Plaid terrifyingly fast and blows away exotics, and it tied for the fastest 1/4 mile they had ever tested | |
| ▲ | heartbreak 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Approximately the same brakes as the Mach E. Maybe worse. | |
| ▲ | bluedino 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's like 40+ mph faster in the 1/4 mile (almost 50%) It does cost double though. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | jmb99 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| In my experience, they’re lots of fun... in a straight line, to a point. I haven’t driven one that turns or stops as well or as “connectedly” as pretty much any enthusiast ICE car. And yes they have instant torque off the line with very good traction control, which makes them much faster at drag strips than most ICE cars, until you get to purpose-built dragsters that are putting down just as fast 60 foots making the same (or more) power but while weighing a few thousand pounds less. Until batteries get waaaaay lighter (like, 2-3 orders of magnitude), I really don’t see them as the future of fun cars. |
|
| ▲ | smileysteve 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Amecdotally, I was behind a Tesla 3 performance at a recent track day; it was lowered on eibach springs, but had more mass than my stock height 2004 bmw 3 series. It couldn't handle the Gs on a slightly negative camber straight, as opposed to I could floor it there. I definitely expected it to clear me on the straights faster. |
|
| ▲ | roamerz 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >>And in street racing, and driving fast responsive cars in general, electric is the future. Street racing is entirely too dangerous and of course illegal. You don't have to race to take part in the street scene, which in that scenario the actual power to weight ratio is somewhat irrelevant in itself. What is relevant to me, personally, is the ambience that surrounds a supercharged radically cammed V8 rumbling down the street. That will give me goosebumps every time. The power is in it's growl, not necessarily it's bite. I don't know how you replicate that in an electric vehicle and I think that feeling transfers to the racetrack as well. I would rather watch a 3-4 second top fuel race rather than a 2-3 second electric car race. Oh yeah if you ever do happen to catch one of those top fuel events don't miss watching them rebuild the engines and the 'let's make sure it runs' startups. The fumes will cause tears in your eyes and your lungs will hurt but it's as good or better than the actual race. |
| |
| ▲ | ryandrake 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > I would rather watch a 3-4 second top fuel race rather than a 2-3 second electric car race. The car enthusiast obsession with vroom-vroom noises has always seemed pretty silly to me. Maybe I just don’t get it. Like heat, loud noises are just a sign of inefficiency and energy loss. A car that goes the same speed as another car, but 10dB quieter is objectively better and more efficient at delivering power to the wheels. A car that is both faster and quieter is even better and more impressive. Like a GPU that delivers high performance without getting hot and needing a fan. A noisy car is a worse car. | | |
| ▲ | ultimafan 14 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | From an enthusiast point of view, I'd wager that it's more because a lot of the most iconic engine noises are distinctive and recognizable based on model and just general throttle feedback and it's a quirk that gives different cars a lot of personality. Versus electric cars not having that personality quirk to really tell them apart- they're all going to be quite similar in "feel" and responsiveness to the throttle. I think in general for more hands on enthusiasts electric will never really quite take over ICE obsession. From a tinkering standpoint, intricate mechanical systems like engines are far more satisfying to pour your hands over when you're rebuilding or modifying an engine than black box electrical systems that you can't really reasonably work on. The act of replacing a physical, actual part instead of plugging in a laptop to twiddle some abstract values is also more gratifying. It's the same reason I imagine that mechanical watches are pretty much universally preferred by watch collectors and enthusiasts over digital ones. edit:
When I think about it more I guess celebrating inefficiencies/nostalgia/the physical aspect of a hobby is not that different anywhere. Like people still collecting vinyl records, or using real CRTs with refurbished consoles instead of emulating, people into collecting physical books / doing their own book bindings instead of switching to digital etc. | |
| ▲ | rootusrootus 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > The car enthusiast obsession with vroom-vroom noises BTW this is a gross generalization. Many of us car enthusiasts, including oldsters like me, love EVs. And if I'm feeling a bit spicy, the fact that I can use 100% of the power without announcing that to the world is exhilarating. I love a big rumbly V8, too, but everything has it's place. |
| |
| ▲ | tzs 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Street racing is entirely too dangerous and of course illegal Someday I wonder if that will change? Consider a future where full self driving cars have been perfected, to the point that they are mandatory. Every car on the road is FSDing, and the cars are also all in communication with nearby cars and with a central planning system. Many humans will still want to drive for fun, and that could be implemented as a mode. In human driving mode the FSD system would still be running but it would be taking driving commands from the human and following them as long as they are safe. Safe in this context means the FSD does not let the car get into any situation where the FSD system won't be able to keep control. The FSD system could coordinate with other nearby cars and the central system to leave more space around the car in HD mode to allow for slower human reflexes. Such a system could also implement a street racing mode, where two or more cars in human driving mode could race, again with the FSD coordinating with other cars and the central planner to clear traffic. | |
| ▲ | drmpeg 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | My mechanic told me the future of racing is hydrogen. You gotta have noise. | | |
| ▲ | smileysteve 17 hours ago | parent [-] | | You really dont though, turbos cut the noise in half in the recent years and it's considerably nicer to watch a race. Recently, the gt3 Porsche cup at an F1 event; you need earplugs for the gt3s 1000' away, but the F1 cars you can have a conversation, not damage your hearing (because of the turbos) |
|
|