▲ | RandomThoughts3 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> The market for these doesn’t care about any of the stuff you mentioned. Yes, that’s because this market basically doesn’t exist which is indeed the Verge point. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | brailsafe 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The difference between your opinion and theirs is that theirs is based on observation, experience, and anecdotes from people who fill that market, and yours is based on speculative extrapolation from a narrower version of observation, anecdotes, experience, based on the fact that you're suggesting it doesn't exist and they've/I've seen it existing. The people who know it to be true will read their thoughts about the market you think doesn't exist, and will agree, and the ones who haven't and don't think it should be rational will agree with you. It does exist. Schools, kids, various platform independent in-office work computers, old people, all kinds; even introducing one layer of complexity and going down one step in prettiness just isn't worth it sometimes. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dagmx 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
In which case, both you and the article can’t be bothered to step outside and understand the market. Or are you both claiming that Apple has an entire multi decade line of products it keeps refreshing without a market? And they dedicate valuable retail space to something that doesn’t sell? This just feels like hubris of not being able to envision other people. | |||||||||||||||||
|