▲ | Aeolun 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The cookie banner is only there because the website in question uses non-functional cookies (e.g. targeted advertising) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Aloisius 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It's gotten entirely out of hand. Most EU national government websites have cookie banners. Even the European Commission website has a cookie banner! This should have been implemented at the browser level. Let the browser generate a nice consistent UI to nag EU users when visiting websites about accepting cookies and let the rest of us opt out. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | KennyBlanken 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The cookie banner is there to punish people who have cookies turned off or set to be deleted upon browser/tab close - and generally annoy everyone else. Think about how obsessive companies are about "UX" and how disruptive the banner is. Bitch-slapping people for fighting against tracking is more important to them than the user being able to access or use the site at all. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | brookst 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Or if the legal department is concerned that someone could claim a cookie is non-functional, so to save the uncertainty and expense they advise always showing the banner. Especially since everyone else does. It seems like there should be a parallel to “tragedy of the commons” that talks about how a good idea coupled with extreme penalties can lead to a bad outcome by making any risk calculation result in “jesus we just can’t take any chances here”. |