Visual part is nice and Landing page and slick. However, I am not trolling but what happens when NextJS is no longer the hot commodity that it is today. I would prefer a Visual CMS that lets me do all this but the output should always be static HTML/CSS/JS. Most tools either do the visual part well but fail at the output or vice versa. I don't mind if the stack is NextJS or whatever but the final output should be a static HTML. Bonus if you can push to deploy to Netlify/Cloudflare Pages/S3 etc

I hope this is the next standard for CMS-style sites. I'm eagerly waiting for the thing that's easy enough for non-coders to use that doesn't make the code-capable maintainers want to cry mercy.

I was pretty optimistic about netlify-cms the approach they took just missed the mark on some technical things that NextJS handles as part of the framework.

Best of luck! IMO there's still lots of opportunity in visual site builders, and this one looks like it has a lot of potential.

The intro graphic shows someone building a website with the title: "Leveraging AI to solve the world's biggest problems"

At first glance this gives the impression that Reweb is some sort of LLM-aided "describe what you want it to build" tool

But (unless I misunderstood) it's mostly a WYSIWYG tool, albeit there does seem to be an "AI theme generation" component

That site crashed my browser

UI looks ripped from Framer

Is there a website builder that emits just vanilla JS and html instead?

Ah so it's a Next.js tool, because of that reason I'm out!

Looks pretty impressive! Kinda makes me jealous as a Sveltekit dev.

They offer a lifetime pricing tier, which will obviously removed in a few years if the company still exists. I wonder why a SaaS would even bother.

I am curious how this compares to developing a site using the various AI/IDE add-ons. If you're already a developer enough to care that it's using Next.js, it seems like bringing up in Cursor might be similarly effective, though less visual.

Still, I'm happy to see developers pursuing tools like this.

I like it. Also pricing is sensible. Yearly $100 is OK for this tool, monthly, I honestly will not even consider, as you can see people are fed up with monthly subs.

I also like what I see in roadmap, you should have components, sync to github etc. So it looks like promising product to me.

I generally like these tools, but I hate how they focus so much on one specific framework.

Tailwind is so general, why wouldn't you build a tool that works with Vue, that works with React, that works with Svelte?

Page title: The visual website builder for Next.js & Tailwind

For me the desire to test something cools down the spot where I am requried to create an account just to test it.

I'd happily pay a fixed fee for a self-hostable desktop app version of this, that just uses Ollama/ChatGPT/Claude for the LLM part. Ideally open source too.

But yet another subscription? ... no thanks

as others have mentioned, this would be great if it would spit html fragments instead of react components. It would be really useful for quickly building htmx apps.

Can you reimport from VS Code back into Reweb?

Or make this a Code extension?

Great to see such a tool not tied to a hosting formula, page views and everything.

I see the value in helping me (the dev) quickly setting up landing pages and including them in my existing website that I host where I want.

For me, visiting this site crashes Firefox on iOS.

This seems like it would be slower than just using Next.js and Tailwind. What is it adding?

is there some free local app like this available?

Tailwind this Tailwind that. There is absolutely no reason these tools can't just output well structured css, but it has to have Tailwind because.

How long do you think this will last, longer than boostrap?

Frontend is such a shit show.

Begind a paywall.