▲ | lubujackson 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Maybe you are too young to remember when they did exactly this to Microsoft. The antitrust thing is a slow moving ship, both to start and stop. MS and Apple both make hardware and control your OS. It is a fundamentally more in-your-face relationship with many more points of contact for an average consumer. That doesn't mean Google has been any less ruthless in pursuit of their almighty quarterly gains. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dismalaf 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
No, I remember the Microsoft anti-trust trial. It was barely a slap on the wrist. If we were to try draw equivalence: they'd ask Google to stop paying to be the default search provider on platforms and to offer a choice of search provider on Android. That would be the same as what they required of MS (simply to not bundle Internet Explorer and to open up APIs). What the EU is currently asking of Apple is maybe equivalent. What the DOJ is currently seeking from Google is way over the top given the MS precedent. | |||||||||||||||||
|