| ▲ | hirvi74 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I've started to notice that GPT-* vs. Claude is quite domain (and even subdomain) specific. For programming, when using languages like C, python, ruby, C#, and JS, both seemed fairly comparable to me. However, I was astounded at how awful Claude was at Swift. Most of what I would get from Claude wouldn't even compile, contained standard library methods that did not exist, and so on. For whatever reason, GPT is night and day better in this regard. In fact, I found GPT to be the best resource for less common languages like Applescript. Of course, GPT is not always correct on the first `n` number of tries, but with enough back-and-forth debugging, GPT really has pulled through for me. I've also found GPT to be better at math and grammar, but only the more advanced models like O1-preview. I do agree with you too that Claude is better in a conversational sense. I have found it to be more empathetic and personable than GPT. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | pertymcpert 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I wonder if OpenAI have been less strict about not training on proprietary or legally questionable code sources. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||