| |
| ▲ | MisterTea 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > but one with a little chernobyl plant and black particles. Now I want one. Where did you buy it from if you don't mind me asking? | | |
| ▲ | blueflow 5 days ago | parent [-] | | From Ukraine via eBay. It shipped within 2 weeks despite the ongoing war. It is apparently a popular tourist souvenir. |
| |
| ▲ | thewanderer1983 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sorry to hijack this thread. I'm using a Dec Vt220, 420 and 510. You posted a git link back in 2020 with your improvements to making it useful. The link no longer works. Are you able to provide an updated link? | | |
| ▲ | blueflow 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I have a site named yin at neocities, from the index page, bottom-most link. I'm not linking directly because it redirects to weeb trash if there is a social site in the referrer. Also if you have questions about the VT520, you could join ##asm on libera IRC. | | |
| |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It is very interesting that my comment above was downvoted! | | |
| ▲ | noman-land 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | No one wants to read someone else's AI generated stuff. We can all do this ourselves. It's like linking to a search result page. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Again, good to know. Although, my AI-generation was a response to an interesting comment. You do not think readers are interested to see how the Chernobyl snow-globes look like?! (Looking at AI generated images or store links.) | | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | But we wouldn't know what it looks like, we would only know what your AI thinks it looks like. So no, we're not interested in filling up our heads with vaguely related AI slop. If you had actually posted the store link that would be an entirely different question, which you've somehow tried to conflate with generated images. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It is wrong to assume/state that people do not want to see these AI-generated images. At this point, ≈40 people have seen that _hidden_ Imgur post. | | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | There's a ton of people in this thread, and there are always a few who will click out of curiosity. That doesn't make it useful. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I don't know... It seems to be fairly entertaining, judging by the number of image album views and the number of comments here. | | |
| ▲ | cr3ative 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Causing annoyance by posting AI slop then having to justify it should not be mistaken for entertainment, it’s closer to trolling. | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | And I've gotten a lot of upvotes for explaining why it's annoying. Perhaps these are not the measures of truth you are looking for. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that is a part of the measure I have in mind. Let me be more concrete. Terms: - P: Number of positive votes (of any comment) - N: Number of negative votes (of any comment) - V: Number of views of the image album - C: Number of comments in the thread Formula: w1 * P + w2 * N + w3 * V + w4 * C
My weights: (w1, w2, w3, w4) = (1, 1, 1, 3)
(Comments are harder to do than votes.) | | |
| ▲ | andrewflnr 3 days ago | parent [-] | | This is a formula that optimizes for trolling. If you insist on using it, expect more downvotes in the future. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 3 days ago | parent [-] | | The formula is generic; my weights are for measuring engagement. (And, yes, I am very scared by the future downvotes.) |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | blueflow 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I clicked on it at least twice and found it disgusting. If more people were like you, thinking this is a good idea, i would stop posting my IRL stories to the internet. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Sorry. If I knew you will have such a negative reaction I would have not posted my reply to your IRL story. | |
| ▲ | Gracana 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Please don't stop. I want to hear more about "said a meme to my wife." | |
| ▲ | Evidlo 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | How are the images any more or less disgusting than the original snowglobe itself? | | |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | dragonwriter 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Although, my AI-generation was a response to an interesting comment. Yes, that's why the comment it was in response to was not downvoted. But being interesting and HN-appropriate isn't something responses automatically inherent from their parent comment. > You do not think readers are interested to see how the Chernobyl snow-globes look like?! Actual Chernobyl snow globes... maybe a link to that would be appropriate. AI hallucinations of what they might look like? Maybe if the context was a discussion of the capacities of different AI models and it was offered as a demonstration of the one that generated it, but not in the context it was presented, no. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | numpad0 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think this _is_ indeed interesting and also indicative of where AI art is going, unironically. People has much higher tolerance for human made low-effort memes. | |
| ▲ | gnatman 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Viewing this image has less value than someone reading the parent comment and imagining the snow globe for themselves. | | |
| ▲ | antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-] | | There are six images, not one. Also, some might say that "a picture is worth a thousand words." |
| |
| ▲ | 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
|
