Remix.run Logo
andrewflnr 4 days ago

There's a ton of people in this thread, and there are always a few who will click out of curiosity. That doesn't make it useful.

antononcube 4 days ago | parent [-]

I don't know... It seems to be fairly entertaining, judging by the number of image album views and the number of comments here.

cr3ative 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Causing annoyance by posting AI slop then having to justify it should not be mistaken for entertainment, it’s closer to trolling.

andrewflnr 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

And I've gotten a lot of upvotes for explaining why it's annoying. Perhaps these are not the measures of truth you are looking for.

antononcube 3 days ago | parent [-]

Yes, that is a part of the measure I have in mind. Let me be more concrete.

Terms:

- P: Number of positive votes (of any comment)

- N: Number of negative votes (of any comment)

- V: Number of views of the image album

- C: Number of comments in the thread

Formula:

    w1 * P + w2 * N + w3 * V + w4 * C
My weights:

   (w1, w2, w3, w4) = (1, 1, 1, 3)
(Comments are harder to do than votes.)
andrewflnr 3 days ago | parent [-]

This is a formula that optimizes for trolling. If you insist on using it, expect more downvotes in the future.

antononcube 3 days ago | parent [-]

The formula is generic; my weights are for measuring engagement.

(And, yes, I am very scared by the future downvotes.)