| ▲ | jhedwards 7 days ago |
| The point (as I understand it) was not to protect the kids themselves from covid, but that kids are active vectors of illness: they get sick easily and rapidly spread it to everyone around them. Sending kids to school during a pandemic is basically asking to fast-track that sickness to everyone in the community. |
|
| ▲ | willy_k 7 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| That’s why you focus resources on protecting those who you don’t want kids to spread it to, the sick and the elderly, a la the suppressed Great Barrington Declaration. |
| |
| ▲ | anigbrowl 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It wasn't 'suppressed'; it was announced to wide acclaim, others took issue with its premises, and there were significantly more of the latter than the former. There was considerable skepticism of the sponsorship of the libtertarian AEIR, and the fact that hundreds of thousands of people had already died in the US by the time of its publication probably had a lot to do with its lack of popularity. | |
| ▲ | immibis 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Or uh, we could stop the virus in its tracks and go back to normal? This was the New Zealand plan, and it worked. |
|
|
| ▲ | nradov 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There was never any scientific basis for that belief. It was just made up without conducting experiments. And if fact we saw that some countries like Sweden kept primary schools open throughout the pandemic (without mask mandates) and it was fine. |
| |
| ▲ | gamerdonkey 7 days ago | parent [-] | | > There was never any scientific basis for that belief. This is an incorrect statement that can be fixed with minutes of research. https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.0610941104
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00916... One might argue about the quality of the research or point out contradicting studies, but saying there was zero basis is flat-out false. Adding that the idea was "made up" is a great example of bending the idea of science to prop up a point. | | |
| ▲ | mike_hearn 7 days ago | parent [-] | | COVID is not the Spanish Flu or asthma. Rayiner's point was about SARS-CoV-2 and he is correct. You can read papers published in 2020 to see. | | |
| ▲ | willy_k 6 days ago | parent [-] | | And COVID and the Spanish Flu essentially targeted opposite populations, the former being dangerous to those with compromised immune function while the latter turned strong immune systems against the body in a “cytokine storm”. |
|
|
|
