▲ | dartos 10 months ago | ||||||||||||||||
Please tell me I’m not the only one that sees the irony in AI relying on classic search. Obviously LLMs are good at some semantic understanding of the prompt context and are useful, but the irony is hilarious | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | antves 10 months ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I think the main bit here is that the knowledge graph is entirely constructed by LLMs. It's not just using a pre-existing knowledge graph. It's creating a knowledge graph on the fly based on your data. Navigating the graph, on the other hand, is the perfect task for PageRank. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | mdp2021 10 months ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What you should note as quaint is probably more like the integration of more "symbolic" strategies to NNs in AI. Past the initial sensation, it is pretty linear that "something good at language" (an interface) be integrated with "something good at information retrieval" (the data). (Still sought what comes next, "something to give reliability to processing".) | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | mehh 10 months ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It’s not AI, it’s a collection technologies and practices within the domain of AI, symbolic and sub symbolic. Arguably classic search is another technology/approach/algorithm with the domain of AI. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | IanCal 10 months ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I don't get what the irony is here. | |||||||||||||||||
|