| ▲ | partloyaldemon 13 minutes ago | |
Was your assertion tried in court? legal reasoning is naïve transitive reasoning. | ||
| ▲ | rookienumbers30 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
a statement *about* the legal system can be true without being litigated *in* the legal system. Courts rely on precedent in addition to logical argument, so their rulings cannot be deduced from rational argument alone. | ||