Strongly disagree.

Just because AI was involved doesn’t mean significant human thought and effort didn’t go into the production of those artifacts.

My agentic software development loop requires heavy involvement of real-world feedback. The ratio is huge. 20 mins of agentic software coding against hours or days of testing, trying it out, real-world contact, thinking about what feature is next or what tweak would make it more usable, smooth, intuitive. That feedback is baked into the product. Forcing it to be open source steals all that time and effort for me, and takes from me the decision as to how and whether to open-source it. So you mean the code that I’ve agentically written to help manage my private financial affairs (on local models, for privacy) or my kids’ complicated school schedules must now be open sourced?

My manners begin to fail, so I’ll stop here.

Thought production isn't copyrightable. Processes and procedures aren't copyrightable. Might get you a patent.

> Just because AI was involved doesn’t mean significant human thought and effort didn’t go into the production of those artifacts.

Doesn't mean it did either. (99% of the time it didn't tho. Nobody reaches to a vibe code machine because they care or want to dedicate effort.)