Hmm you should really benchmark against

https://github.com/browser-use/browser-harness https://github.com/anomalyco/browse https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser

The answer is very likely not a MCP server. browse (anomalyco) is relatively new; but the other 2 are battle tested in production….

▲

vidarh 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Does any of these handle the case where the site needs you to pass a bot detection that fails if the browser is remote controlled and so need a human to access the same profile via a non-remote controlled browser first?

That's what's stopping me from using most of these things instead of just having the agent drive a browser directly with lower level integrations.

	▲	testtestmetest an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[dead]

▲

lukevp 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

None of these do the same thing as the posted MCP. It’s about batching and diff/deltas to reduce token usage and latency.

	▲	snake_doc 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Benchmark for the end 2 end browser tasks…. The other options operate at a different level of abstraction where the actions space also reduce token usage and latency…