Maybe I misunderstand, but I don't agree with the "Permanent Underclass":

> Socially: there is no more social mobility, your lot in life is determined by how much capital you had when the music stopped. Growing your human capital is no longer incentivized, since it doesn’t change your life outcomes.

One way to change that is violence, right? Not that it is necessarily desirable, but that makes this situation "non permanent"?

▲

pcthrowaway an hour ago | parent | next [-]

If bourgeoise interests control ASI and folks are constantly surveilled (as they pretty much are now), I struggle to imagine how an attempt at violent revolution can be successful

	▲	palata an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Except that "Permanent Underclass" goes under "no ASI".

▲

rf_physics an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Presumably full automation means that violence won't be practical either, since they'll have robot police and drones?