?! We know how to send rockets up, we know how to send them back to earth. We know how to stabilize a rocket. I mean we fly them for ages?!

'that difficult'

Look at projects like James Webb telescope.

▲

redox99 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You don't understand the precision required to catch a 70m tall behemoth when you have Earths atmosphere. It's not even close to bringing a capsule to an approximate area, a small ship somewhere with almost no atmosphere, or even landing a rocket on a pad (which we've only had since Falcon 9)

▲

origini 2 hours ago | parent [-]

But others are also working on it and showed they can do it too?

	▲	motionlessveloc an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Today was literally the first time humanity flew a rocket to orbit and landed it vertically.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

derektank an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

“The James Webb telescope is just a three mirror korsch telescope in space. We’ve known how to build those since the 30s and we’ve been putting telescopes in space since the 60s. Doesn’t seem that impressive”

This is what you sound like to everyone else here

	▲	origini an hour ago \| parent [-]
		And i can easily explain to you why this is not the case. They put the most advanced telescope at L2 which is the most remote location 1.5 million km away which can't be serviced and can't be rebuild easily. It has nanometer optical precision in space which needs to be cooled through multiply layers of high tec foil. Its mirrors are precicse to nm level. Took 25 years of planning and 5 years of building.