I should also mention that the analysis was conducted in collaboration with a lawyer specializing in data protection and ethical hacking.

▲

jacquesm 19 minutes ago | parent [-]

That's an important bit of information that probably should make it into the blog, and I hope you guys made the right call, but I think that that is probably not the case. Best of luck.

oh: "What isn’t mentioned in the analysis is that we ran a System 1 decision model on each dataset to determine whether it contained privacy-sensitive data."

I hope at least that that was a local model. If not you've made things considerably worse.

	▲	neathack 6 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It’s mentioned in the Handelsblatt article linked in the blog post. Since the lawyer was brought in by the newspaper, we didn’t mention their involvement in the post. All LLM-based analysis was performed using local models, specifically the "elephant-1" model on our local RTX Pro 4000 SFF. I respect your insistence on proper data handling -- you’re right in doing so -- and we tried to be as careful as possible when conducting the analysis. Now let’s hold Lovable to the same standard.