Did you somehow see defense of infidelity in my comment (hope not, because it wasn't there), or are you reflecting on the general trend?

Who do you feel is creepy here (or a man, for that matter)?

Infidelity (in itself) is not the thing that got either of those 2 men fired.

That statement doesn't say anything about how anyone here feels about infidelity, nor whether it should or shouldn't be enough of a reason to fire a CEO.

I don't see anyone supporting infidelity here.

However, in a thread about Jensen, I've seen multiple people argue with me that the CEO having sex with subordinates isn't problematic at all (with total disregard for the power imbalance and potential for coercion).

That was, indeed, very sad.