Remix.run Logo
▲ s__s a day ago

AI tech is nowhere near reliable enough to be introduced in such important systems. I find this deeply troubling even if it’s not related to the current issue.

▲Frost1x a day ago | parent | next [-]

I think it depends on what it’s doing and if backup systems exist. Scheduling and prioritizing certain flights for landing seems like a reasonable application as an example. Anything realtime dependent or near realtime it shouldn’t touch. But there seems like lots of less critical applications it could provide some value.

▲coffeefirst a day ago | parent [-]

Why make any of that probabilistic at all?

▲vikramkr a day ago | parent | next [-]

Fasster response incorporating more varied data sources more easily

▲technol0gic a day ago | parent | prev [-]

because theyre mathematically introducing error/nondeterminism for money

▲ransom1538 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

We can use Chinese models? (I am referring to the LLMs).

▲hlecuanda a day ago | parent [-]

I see what you did there

▲augment_me a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

▲gnabgib a day ago | parent | next [-]

It's not a documentary

▲johnofthesea 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Did you seriously replied with fiction?

▲xp84 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Personally I fail to understand how we could possibly benefit from a non-deterministic AI system, when normal computer systems are more than capable of managing a 3-dimensional airspace using nothing but basic math. Smells like pork for sure :/

▲rooftopzen a day ago | parent | prev [-]

Curious where the people are who said AI will be doing x in y months (for their valuations) - it never will. Where are they hiding?