| ▲ | jacquesm 6 hours ago | |
It isn't even optional. Anything with a motor should have sufficient executive authority on board to decide on how to safely power down in case of trouble. Loss of communications is a major impediment to deploying robotics to the point that I think it should be outlawed to have robots that do not have all of their thinking done locally. But I suspect that this will be one of those regulations written in blood. | ||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | lovich 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
At the bare minimum there should be a local independent system that safely shuts down the robot if it doesn’t get heartbeats from their control network | ||