Among other things, the distaste for intense scrutinization of productivity, the extremely deep involvement of the CEO in all facets of the business, and intent to distribute profit to employees as much as possible (something Jensen insisted on in company wide meetings a lot) to name a few big ones.

▲

cashsterling 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

60 direct reports and the amount of time Jensen travels and was at conferences and on TV mean "extremely deep involvement in all facets of the business" (or in much of anything) is not possible.

I don't care if Jensen is superhuman... there are only 24 hours in a day and he has to sleep at least 4-6 of those. The remaining 18 hours is simply not enough time for anyone to get deeply involved in more than few focused areas at any one time.

On the flip-side... some CEO's with technical backgrounds like it to seem like they are intimately involved in crucial technical brainstorming, invention, and design sessions. The reality is, in almost all cases, the hard and deeply-innovative work was done by a group of subject matter experts (who had the time and expertise to get extremely deeply involved) before the CEO ever stepped foot in a meeting room on the topic. The meeting is there to make the CEO feel like they were deeply involved and win their buy-in for the decision that has already been made.

Edit: Jensen is one of the all-time great tech CEO's ... not trying to cast shade on him. I have made a lot of money off nVIDIA over the last 10+ years and think they are worse off without him.

▲

fidotron a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> the distaste for intense scrutinization of productivity

Do you mean a lack of KPIs driving HR decisions?

	▲	Conscat 17 hours ago \| parent [-]
		HR essentially reviews us once at the end of every year. It is primarily our managers who oversee our productivity, and they're all too busy to micromanage anyone (and discouraged from it anyways). There are no quarterly reviews, no regularly scheduled layoffs, no extremely deep management hierarchies, etc. Compared to Google, Amazon, or Meta, we have a huge amount of freedom as well as very open insight into most of what other teams are doing on Slack. I follow several developer Slack channels for software I was a fan of prior to onboarding. I read online that there isn't a standard hiring procedure, but in my interviews they didn't give me esoteric coding puzzles, they mainly wanted to discuss computers and let me yap about my interests. The whiteboard problems were trivial.

▲

cyanydeez a day ago | parent | prev [-]

so, I assume you don't believe Huang violated export controls and didn't cause NVIDIA to have heavy liabilities both from government oversight and from the circular financing.

▲

Conscat a day ago | parent [-]

I have no idea whether he violated export controls. It sounds plausible, but there's no evidence to this yet as far as I am aware. I suspect he may be stepping down out of shame for his actions, especially since his children have roles in the company, but I have no insight into his mind or personal life.

	▲	cyanydeez 20 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So, he was either complicit or ignorant. It's amusing how people mentally backflip through the dots like they're unwilling to do any mental math that might shatter the soothing tail of people just being mere happenstance and human rather than some power above others. I think you should read more reports on both the circular financing and the smuggling of chips into China. Or the evidence of the Chinese models being trained on blackwell chips. All the stars are there, either he's complicit or ignorant. Choose which you're asking to lead you.