It's literally an example of someone keeping themselves from becoming obsolete with AI.

sheikhnbake 44 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The professor's value was/is in being one of a few people with the capability of interpreting the shorthand. By translating it with AI, his value as an interpreter begins evaporating as the translated workbooks become accessible to more logicians.

	▲	Bayart 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		He might see his value in his role of carrying the knowledge itself rather than being its gatekeeper.

▲

ShinyLeftPad an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

That's what he thinks, surely.

▲

bdamm an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It's clear though. Even if an AI had connected all the dots on the obsolete shorthand, it would never have recognized the human value. I doubt that any AI process would choose to spend the energy on interpreting this particular obsolete handwriting and then understand that it was from the hand of a genius.

	▲	ShinyLeftPad an hour ago \| parent [-]
		But is he needed once he finished writing the prompt?

▲

jvanderbot 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Using AI to do your job does not mean that AI suddenly walks in the door and escorts you out and starts collecting your paycheck.

Someone is still driving these studies, and probably will be for a while. Or maybe not. But still we can reward this guy for opening up this can of theorems that had before.

Silliest case: Imagine a dusty basement terminal screen open to claude code with "There we go! Cancer is cured as you requested, let me know and I'll send off the results" and nobody is around to approve it.