| ▲ | torginus a day ago | |||||||||||||
I was out for 2 weeks, and the resident meat proxies on my team managed to half-destroy the project by doing everything the way AI wanted to, instead of how the company systems work, introduced like half a dozen cross-connections across barriers that should never be crossed, introduced a parallel artifact repo, permissions system, and different build tooling to what the rest use (including what the current project was built with), and managed to create a lot of drama with external teams who refused to work with these new systems. AI still needs lots of guidance, and might seem like a genius that does everything on its own, until you give it to people who can't guide it and things begin spiraling out of control. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 8by3 a day ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The same could easily have happened pre LLMs (just slower). Its why things like ArchUnit existed, or style guides, or annoying architects who stopped engineers from using latest JS framework pre LLMs, to define high level requirements for software. I try to avoid justifying my own existence, but its a reason why I think skilled engineers are way more productive using LLM's than person off the street. Because they can confine them. Though there is no technical reason that ability can't be codified. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 8by3 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I've actually been thinking about this issues for a while, that agents are way more successful if they have a decent architect guiding them vs. full vibe. I've been solo prenuering for the last year so didn't have a lot of data from others but your comment convinced me its a problem worth solving, so I put this together https://vitruvius.8by3.com/ Its hard wip, pushed seconds ago, paint still wet. But the idea is to "enforce" good architectural practices for your agents. Can store constrains and ADRs in git so everyone in a team (everyones agents) can read from the same page. | ||||||||||||||