He is simply untrustworthy now. He could not say or do anything related to China without suspicions about his motives. There is also quite a risk that Alice has taken compromising photos of him, which could be used to blackmail him.

He should have been more paranoid. That he wasn’t makes him unfit to be CEO of Nvidia.

▲

throw1234567891 a day ago | parent [-]

The motives of the ex NVIDIA CEO on China seem quite clear to me. What's not clear to you?

	▲	imartin2k 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I'm talking about a hypothetical future in which Jensen would remain CEO of Nvidia, as asked for by the employees signing the petition. Any future stance regarding China would be considered unreliable. Some would suspect Jensen may be compromised and thus not being able to speak/act freely. Others would assume the opposite - that he feels he has to overcorrect, and talk/act tougher towards China than what's necessary, wise, or helpful for the – to not come across as compromised. Either way – in such a position, it is impossible to do a good CEO job at one of the most important companies of the world.