| ▲ | pitabas106 2 days ago |
| I have always felt it's less about email redundancy and more about having a backup plan. If outlook goes down tomorrow, does everyone know how to keep work and client communication moving? that is something worth thinking about. |
|
| ▲ | emil-lp 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Who wants to bet that Microsoft is using slack to communicate now? |
| |
| ▲ | enopod_ 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Fire up that old IRC server! | | |
| ▲ | nameless912 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You joke, but during my time at Netflix there were at least two layers of backup communication systems: if slack went down, we would jump to google chat, and if google chat somehow went down too, there was an IRC server and a (hardware) phone bridge. I never touched any of it because I wasn't an SRE, but I did read through the training one day because I was bored. | |
| ▲ | fatata123 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [dead] | |
| ▲ | EmX_3000 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | There was no need to abandon perfectly working technology, with pain some people might learn this. Departmental servers, pesky lordly sysadmins, this was a working sustainable system that even scaled to the phone company and US government levels. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | SubiculumCode 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| For the amount of uneeded emails about future emails about other emails, probably no real work was lost. |